Workplace Environment Assessment Assignment

Assignment: Workplace Environment Assessment Clearly, speciality is a precarious feature of heartinesscare. However, the extreme scope of a speciality is the outgrowth and impression of a course of compositions or protocols. Isolated acknowledgment of a heartiness children does petty to dictate it. In this module’s Discussion, you applied the Clark Healthy Workplace Inventory to diagnose immanent problems delay the politeness of your structure. In this Portfolio Assignment, you succeed hold to excite the results and apportion published discovery to the outgrowth of a contemplated composition for any childrens uncovered by the assessment. To Prepare: Review the Resources and explore the Clark Healthy Workplace Inventory, base on page 20 of Clark (2015). Review the Effect Environment Assessment Template. Reflect on the output of your Discussion shaft in-reference-to your evaluation of effectplace politeness and the feedback accepted from colleagues. Select and reconsideration one or further of the subjoined declaration base in the Resources: Clark, Olender, Cardoni, and Kenski (2011) Clark (2018) Clark (2015) Griffin and Clark (2014) The Assignment (3-6 pages aggregate): Part 1: Effect Environment Assessment (1-2 pages) Review the Effect Environment Assessment Template you completed for this Module’s Discussion. Describe the results of the Effect Environment Assessment you completed on your effectplace. Identify two things that surprised you environing the results and one subject you believed anterior to conducting the Assessment that was grown. Explain what the results of the Assessment propose environing the heartiness and politeness of your effectplace. Part 2: Reviewing the Literary-works (1-2 pages) Briefly delineate the scheme or concept presented in the boundary(s) you chosen. Explain how the scheme or concept presented in the boundary(s) relates to the results of your Effect Environment Assessment. Explain how your structure could apportion the scheme highlighted in your chosen boundary(s) to rectify structureal heartiness and/or make stronger effect teams. Be specific and get examples. Part 3: Evidence-Based Strategies to Make High-Performance Interprofessional Teams (1–2 pages) Recommend at smallest two strategies, befriended in the literary-works, that can be implemented to address any shortcomings biblical in your Effect Environment Assessment. Recommend at smallest two strategies that can be implemented to tinker fortunate practices biblical in your Effect Environment Assessment.