Week 2 Project: Comparing Criminal Justice Systems

  The cases of Amanda Knox and Michael Fay tender good-tempered-tempered opportunities to collate culpable fairness rules. Twain were youthful US citizens prisoner of crimes in other countries. These cases imaginative the be-unlikeences among the US culpable fairness rule and those of other nations. Consider such factors as pretrial loose, load of probation, correct to refer, and emblem of punishment. Prepare a tidings in a 4- to 5-page Microsoft Word muniment responding to the forthcoming questions: What were the alleged crimes compromised? Summarize twain the cases. Did the flatter rule use an adversarial or minute rule? Explain. What were the developed upshots of the cases? Provide a lawful account for the upshot and defend your defense delay embezzle examination and rationalistic. In what ways did the order be-unlike from how it would accept occurred in the United States? In what ways was the order congruous to that in the United States? Explain delay special rationalistic. Support your responses delay examples. Cite any sources in APA format. Submission Details Name your muniment SU_CRJ3025_W2_A2_LastName_FirstInitial.doc.