W10A5

   PLEASE WRITE ON A GRAD LEVEL AND FOLLOW THE RUBRIC BELOW!!! Assignment 5: Using Reports in the LMS Due Week 10 and excellence 160 points Once a series or inoculation module is exposed in an LMS, it is significant to see how the novices or instructors are using the prescribe. Every LMS has ability to fruit relations that succor stakeholders wield, tend, and mend the letters test for novices and the training test for instructors. You are granted after a while some relations generated from a series in Blackboard. These relations can succor manifest if you keep any possessions that are not interesting learners or if the anticipated season frames to discharge tasks are inaccurate. In conjunction, these relations succor to invent remediation for novices and fix that instructors are dischargeing their jobs. OPEN PDF FILES TO VIEW THE REPORTS  WHICH ARE ATTACHED BELOW!!!!!  essence pdf novice x relation pdf novice y relation pdf novice z relation pdf You accomplish need to ANALYZE THE REPORTS AND RECOMMEND CHANGES TO IMPROVE THE LMS BASED ON YOUR ANALYSIS!!! Write a disgusting to six (4-6) page tract in which you: 1. Summarize your findings and partition from the relations granted. Determine the deep areas that buy novices and the deep areas that do not. 2. Determine at smallest two (2) areas that you would relish to mend, if you had the antecedent to frame changes to the LMS itself, in prescribe to mend the series or the functionality of the LMS. Procure a rationale for your acceptance. 3. Recommend at smallest two (2) changes to the LMS that accomplish augment novices’ letters and / or stakeholder’s managing tests. Procure a rationale for your monition. 4. Suggest a targeted relation that you appetition the LMS could procure for either novices or talent in prescribe to learn novice proceeding, adviser essence, or other interactions after a while the LMS. Procure a rationale for your acceptance. 5. Procure at smallest three (3) true, pertinent, peer-reviewed allusions (no over than one [1] used previously), published after a whilein the definite five (5) years that assistance the tract’s claims. 6. Format your assignment according to the forthcoming formatting requirements: a. Typed, inclose spaced, using Times New Roman font (bulk 12), after a while one-inch margins on all sides. b. Embody a hide page containing the inscription of the assignment, the novice’s indicate, the professor’s indicate, the series inscription, and the continuance. The hide page is not middle in the required page diffusiveness. c. Embody a allusion page. Citations and allusions must ensue APA format. The allusion page is not middle in the required page diffusiveness. The specific series letters outcomes associated after a while this assignment are: · Evaluate tribute tools and capabilities of an LMS. · Design letters possessions based on end user or organizational needs. · Use technology and counsel resources to discovery issues in technology tools to wield letters. · Write explicitly and concisely about issues in technology tools to wield letters using peculiar fitness mechanics.    Points: 160 Assignment 5: Using Reports in the LMS   Criteria Unacceptable Below   70% F Fair 70-79%   C Proficient 80-89%   B Exemplary 90-100%   A   1. Summarize your findings and   partition from the relations granted. Determine the deep areas that buy   students and the deep areas that do not. Weight: 15% Did not comply or inaccurately   summarized your findings and partition from the relations granted. Did not   comply or inaccurately solid the deep areas that buy novices and the   deep areas that do not. Partially summarized your   findings and partition from the relations granted. Partiallysolid the deep   areas that buy novices and the deep areas that do not. Satisfactorily summarized your   findings and partition from the relations granted. Satisfactorily solid   the deep areas that buy novices and the deep areas that do not. Thoroughly summarized your   findings and partition from the relations granted. Thoroughly solid   the deep areas that buy novices and the deep areas that do not.   2. Determine at smallest two (2)   areas that you would relish to mend, if you had the antecedent to frame   changes to the LMS itself, in prescribe to mend the series or the   functionality of the LMS. Procure a rationale for your acceptance.   Weight: 20% Did not comply or inaccurately   solid at smallest two (2) areas that you would relish to mend if you had   the antecedent to frame changes to the LMS itself in prescribe to mend the   series or the functionality of the LMS. Did not comply or inaccurately   granted a rationale for your acceptance. Partially solid at smallest two   (2) areas that you would relish to mend if you had the antecedent to frame   changes to the LMS itself in prescribe to mend the series or the functionality   of the LMS. Imperfectly granted a rationale for your acceptance. Satisfactorily solid at smallest   two (2) areas that you would relish to mend if you had the antecedent to frame   changes to the LMS itself in prescribe to mend the series or the functionality   of the LMS. Satisfactorily granted a rationale for your acceptance. Thoroughly solid at smallest two   (2) areas that you would relish to mend if you had the antecedent to frame   changes to the LMS itself in prescribe to mend the series or the functionality   of the LMS. Thoroughly granted a rationale for your acceptance.   3. Recommend at smallest two (2)   changes to the LMS that accomplish augment novices’ letters and / or   stakeholder’s managing tests. Procure a rationale for your   recommendation. Weight: 20% Did not comply or inaccurately   recommended at smallest two (2) changes to the LMS that accomplish augment novices’   letters and / or stakeholder’s managing tests. Did not comply or   inaccurately granted a rationale for your monition. Partially recommended at   smallest two (2) changes to the LMS that accomplish augment novices’ letters and /   or stakeholder’s managing tests. Imperfectly granted a rationale   for your monition. Satisfactorilyrecommended at smallest   two (2) changes to the LMS that accomplish augment novices’ letters and / or   stakeholder’s managing tests. Satisfactorily granted a rationale   for your monition. Thoroughlyrecommended at smallest two   (2) changes to the LMS that accomplish augment novices’ letters and / or   stakeholder’s managing tests. Thoroughly granted a rationale for your   recommendation.   4. Suggest a targeted relation that   you appetition the LMS could procure for either novices or talent in prescribe to   learn novice proceeding, adviser essence, or other interactions after a while the   LMS. Procure a rationale for your acceptance. Weight: 20% Did not comply or inaccurately   suggested a targeted relation that you appetition the LMS could procure for either   students or talent in prescribe to learn novice proceeding, adviser   activity, or other interactions after a while the LMS. Did not comply or inaccurately   granted a rationale for your acceptance. Partially suggested a targeted   relation that you appetition the LMS could procure for either novices or talent in   prescribe to learn novice proceeding, adviser essence, or other interactions   after a while the LMS. Imperfectly granted a rationale for your acceptance. Satisfactorily suggested a   targeted relation that you appetition the LMS could procure for either novices or   talent in prescribe to learn novice proceeding, adviser essence, or other   interactions after a while the LMS. Satisfactorily granted a rationale for your   response. Thoroughly suggested a targeted   relation that you appetition the LMS could procure for either novices or talent in   prescribe to learn novice proceeding, adviser essence, or other interactions   after a while the LMS. Thoroughly granted a rationale for your acceptance.   5. Procure at smallest three (3)   reliable, pertinent, peer-reviewed allusions (no over than one [1] used   previously), published after a whilein the definite five (5) years that assistance the   paper’s claims. Weight: 5% No allusions granted. Does not converge the required estimate   of allusions; some or all allusions indigent temper choices. Meets estimate of required   references; all allusions eminent temper choices. Exceeds estimate of required   references; all allusions eminent temper choices.   6. Fitness Mechanics, Grammar, and   Formatting Weight: 5% Serious and permanent falsitys in   grammar, spelling, punctuation, or formatting. Partially frank of falsitys in   grammar, spelling, punctuation, or formatting. Mostly frank of falsitys in name,   spelling, punctuation, or formatting. Error frank or closely falsity frank   grammar, spelling, punctuation, or formatting.   7. Appropriate use of APA in-text   citations and allusion individuality Weight: 5% Lack of in-text citations and / or   lack of allusion individuality. In-text citations and allusions   are granted, but they are singly imperfectly formatted unexceptionably in APA name. Most in-text citations and   references are granted, and they are generally formatted unexceptionably in APA   style. In-text citations and allusions   are falsity frank or closely falsity frank and accordingly formatted unexceptionably in   APA name.   8. Counsel Literacy /   Integration of Sources Weight: 5% Serious falsitys in the integration   of sources, such as studied or immanent plagiarism, or want to use   in-text citations. Sources are imperfectly integrated   using powerful techniques of quoting, paraphrasing, and summarizing. Sources are for-the-most-part integrated   using powerful techniques of quoting, paraphrasing, and summarizing. Sources are accordingly   integrated using powerful techniques of quoting, paraphrasing, and   summarizing.   9. Clarity and Coherence of   Writing Weight: 5% Information is confusing to the   reader and fails to embody reasons and averment that logically assistance   ideas. Information is imperfectly distinct   after a while minimal reasons and averment that logically assistance ideas. Information is for-the-most-part distinct and   generally assistanceed after a while reasons and averment that logically assistance ideas. Information is granted in a   clear, logical, and consonant deportment after a while reasons and averment that   logically assistance ideas.