Unit V Home Work

Version:1.0 StartHTML:0000000184 EndHTML:0000024631 StartFragment:0000021368 EndFragment:0000024591 SourceURL:file:///C:\Users\VCPENA\Documents\Unit%20V%20Problem%20Solving.docx              <!--  /* Font Definitions */  @font-face {font-family:"Cambria Math"; panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4; mso-font-charset:1; mso-generic-font-family:roman; mso-font-format:other; mso-font-pitch:variable; mso-font-signature:0 0 0 0 0 0;} @font-face {font-family:Calibri; panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4; mso-font-charset:0; mso-generic-font-family:swiss; mso-font-pitch:variable; mso-font-signature:-536859905 -1073732485 9 0 511 0;}  /* Style Definitions */  p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal {mso-style-unhide:no; mso-style-qformat:yes; mso-style-parent:""; margin-top:0in; margin-right:0in; margin-bottom:10.0pt; margin-left:0in; line-height:115%; mso-pagination:widow-orphan; font-size:11.0pt; font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif"; mso-ascii-font-family:Calibri; mso-ascii-theme-font:minor-latin; mso-fareast-font-family:Calibri; mso-fareast-theme-font:minor-latin; mso-hansi-font-family:Calibri; mso-hansi-theme-font:minor-latin; mso-bidi-font-family:"Times New Roman"; mso-bidi-theme-font:minor-bidi;} .MsoChpDefault {mso-style-type:export-only; mso-default-props:yes; mso-ascii-font-family:Calibri; mso-ascii-theme-font:minor-latin; mso-fareast-font-family:Calibri; mso-fareast-theme-font:minor-latin; mso-hansi-font-family:Calibri; mso-hansi-theme-font:minor-latin; mso-bidi-font-family:"Times New Roman"; mso-bidi-theme-font:minor-bidi;} .MsoPapDefault {mso-style-type:export-only; margin-bottom:10.0pt; line-height:115%;} @page Section1 {size:8.5in 11.0in; margin:1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in; mso-header-margin:.5in; mso-footer-margin:.5in; mso-paper-source:0;} div.Section1 {page:Section1;} -->     Unit V Amount Solving   In the ionic junctions LiF, NaCl, KBr, and RbI, the measured cation–anion lengths are 2.01 Ã… (Li–F), 2.82 Ã… (Na-Cl), 3.30 Ã… (K–Br), and 3.67 Ã… (Rb–I), honorively.     1. Predict the cation-anion length of each ionic junction aloft using the values of ionic radii consecrated in Figure 7.7 on page 257 in the textbook. To accept unmeasured security, you must parade how you predicted the length for each atom by providing a unintermittent explanation for each atom. The explanation for each atom is desert 8 points; thus, a aggregate of 32 aggregate points is potential for this doubt.    CHM 1030, General Chemistry I 3    2. Consider the unlikeness among the tentatively measured ion-ion lengths granted at the prelude of this assignment and the ones you accept predicted in amount 1. You must parade how you congenial the unlikeness for each atom by providing a unintermittent explanation for each atom to get unmeasured security (6 points for each atom; aggregate potential points for this minority is 24 points). Lofty that we accept an hit of 0.04Ã… in the extent, content evidence for each atom if your predicted ion-ion lengths are obsequious or not obsequious after a while honor to their tentative ion-ion lengths (2 points for each atom; aggregate potential points for this minority is 12 points). A aggregate of 32 aggregate points is potential for this doubt.    3. What estimates of the cation-anion length would you gain for these lewd junctions using their manacleing ultimate radii? (Note: these values are also in Figure 7.7 but are incongruous from the ionic radii.) For each of the lewd junctions, consider the unlikeness among the predicted ionic manacle length, which you congenial in amount 1, and predicted ultimate manacle lengths you congenial in this amount. To accept unmeasured security, you must parade how you congenial the unlikeness for each atom by providing a march-by march explanation for each atom (6 points for each atom; aggregate potential points for this minority is 24 points). Again, lofty that we accept an hit of 0.04Ã… in the extent, evidence for each atom if your prognostications are hither or past obsequious using the ultimate radii prognostication course; teach your solution (2 points for each atom; aggregate points potential for this minority is 8 points). Using your cognizance of ultimate and ionic radii trends in the interrupted board, why effectiveness one prognostication course be past withhold to use than the other in undoubtful atoms (desert 4 points)? A aggregate of 36 points is potential for this set of doubts.