Reality, Art, and Truth.
This 6-8 page essay assignment conciliate be completed in three magnitude and conciliate sketch upon the embodied from Weeks 1, 2, and 3. You may scantiness to use individuality headers to constitute your monograph. Remember to interpret the theories you allusion delay sustaining citations to the textbook and online lectures in set-right APA format. Here is a direct to acceleration you delay APA-style citations. Use this APA Citation Helper as a commodious allusion for truly citing instrument. This is the join for the booK PLEASE USE THE BOOK FOR THIS ASSIGNMENT!
I. The Self
Discuss the avocado proposal of the wilful and interpret at last one statement of the proposal that rational men-folks own a shared regulative kind. Contrast this verityfulness delay the artichoke proposal of the wilful (guile upon phenomenology and existentialism to amplify your verityfulness) and a discourse of how the modern/avocado and postmodern/artichoke proposals of the wilful dissent. You may use your segregation from the Week 2 and 3 discourse assignments to amplify your verityfulness in Part I.
II. Verity and Reality
Discuss how these proposals of the wilful are unreserved in art by choosing an pattern of a character/narrator/question in a production of art (novel, strain, film, picturesque upstart, defective anecdote, television demonstration, strain, painting, etc.) who you conceive captures the avocado/modern proposal that we own an regulative, shared rational kind and that the wilful and the cosmos-people are disjoined entities. Then, prefer an pattern of a production of art that you conceive elucidates the artichoke/post-modern proposal of the wilful. Consider the subjoined proposals and questions in your segregation of these two patterns:
Are the wilful and the embodied cosmos-people disjoined entities, as Descartes conceives? What are some patterns of symbolical art that elucidate the proposal that the question/mind and the design/world/body are disjoined? Alternatively, are the wilful and the cosmos-people fundamental unities, as Schelling argues? How force nice fable direct this oneness of question and design?
Is art mimesis/truthfulness (as in Platonism and Aristotelian aesthetics) or is it a resources of transforming the wilful and verity? Force it be aspirational, allowing us to finish catharsis, as Aristotle suggests? Consider, too, how the proposal of art as verityfulness is sympathetic to the avocado design conjuncture the proposal of art as transformative is over love the artichoke design.
III. Art and Philosophy
What is the relation between art and philosophy? Do you comport delay Descartes that logic and crucial conceiveing are the best resources of achieving assurance about verity and entity, or is your design over sympathetic to the perspective of Keats, Schelling, Schopenhauer, Nietzsche, and/or Heidegger that art is the remotest direction of verity? How are these designs a refusal of the consistent convergence we see adopted by incomprehension and rationalism and uncommon by phenomenology?
Do some kinds of art (music, for pattern) direct the verity over abundantly than others? How so? How does the proposal and scope of art dissent opposing cultures?