Oil Boom in Nigeria: What are the Socio-Economic Implications for Society from 1999-2014?
Chapter 1: Introduction
Nigeria is one of the innate oil pliant countries in the globe. Nigeria’s administration was abundantly characterised by urban product alongside other consumer pi up to the 1980’s, when oil plenty took aggravate the priority of the state’s administration. For over than three decades, Nigeria has exploited her oil media for ship-produce. The emergence of oil as Nigeria’s deep fountain of mammon has generated a compute of scrutinys concerning the signification of the oil plenty to the socio-economic harvest of Nigeria companionship. It has been frequently antecedent that Nigeria’s vast oil deposits would goad socio-economic augmentation and put the state unarranged the globe’s aristocracy nations in conditions of economic augmentation and gregarious success (Ian and Terry, 2003).
Since insurrection from Great Britain in 1960, Nigerians enjoy accustomed a compute of problems ranging from ethno-pious and divisional conflicts to taint. According to Gboyega (1996) the post-recalcitrant Nigeria is one that has perforeprimand the aggression of directorship-induced destitution instigated by taint scandals, pious charlatanism, war, waywardness, gregarious mutability, order of counterpoisebearing regimes, and want to organize basic amenities unarranged other issues. Ironically, these challenges enjoy excited during the time when Nigeria accustomed what is frequently referred to as the ‘oil boom’ (Gboyega, 1996, p.39). Julius-Adeoye (2010) believes that Nigeria’s stern socio-economic exigency started presently succeeding insurrection, when the state’s directors deteriorateed the nation’s media delay mighty taint allegations at the expenditure of citizens’ wellbeing; excuses that soldierly generals used to soar coups from the civilian legislationrs.
Whilst it was expected that the preface of Nigeria’s democratically elected council in 1999 subordinate the directorship of President Olesegun Obasanjo would see unanticipated shift of fortunes for Nigerians, the state has not realised abundant movement in conditions of gregarious movement notwithstanding the abundant hyped economic augmentation (Salawu, 2010). Data denote that Nigeria’s oil mammon hit US$ 300 billion in the conclusive two decades quaint (Balouga, 2009). But it is the agitate in mammon (aggravate USD$112 billion among 2004 and 2007 quaint) during Obasanjo’s prevail that has honorpowerful scrutinys encircling the state’s priorities and socio-economic harvest plans.
One scrutiny one would ask is; where did Nigeria got it crime in conditions of socio-economic harvestTo counterpart this scrutiny, there is scarcity to subordinatestand how defining regimes of General Ibrahim Babangida and following Olesegun Obasanjo enjoy contributed to the socio-economic slump of the genesiss-rich Nigeria.
1.1 Aim and Objectives
This consider grant to organize the twist of two directors of Nigeria, General Ibrahim Babangida (1985-1993) and President Olusegun Obasanjo (1999-2007) on Nigeria’s oil and gas refountain superintendence and the socio-economic collision delay General Babangida elucidation the step in the years of disorder and missuperintendence of learnive media, he set a occurrence that would following sustain the economic and gregarious erection of Nigeria and its crowd for following years. Sadly, the curve of inadequacy did not look to end delay soldierly legislation but extended delay the civilian legislation of the democratically elected council (Odebode, 2004).
To organize the role of General Babangida’s regime on the oil refountain superintendence and socio-economic harvest of Nigeria
To fulfill the twist of President Obasanjo’s prevail as a democratically elected director on the oil refountain superintendence and socio-economic harvest of Nigeria
To fulfill ways in which directorship can be used to counterpoise Nigeria’s socio-economic harvest and emend oil refountain superintendence
1.2 Discovery Questions
What is the signification of Babangida and Obasanjo’s regimes in the socio-economic harvest of Nigeria?
What is the signification of oil plenty to the socio-economic harvest of Nigeria’s socio-economic harvest?
What twists do the oil media enjoy on the topical communities’ gregarious integration and economic wellbeing?
To what space has the prevails of these directors enthralled in the erudition encircling Nigeria’s harvestal agenda?
Chapter 2: Erudition Review
There is a weighty learnion of erudition on Nigeria’s harvest framework. It has been vivid as having components of taint, consumerism, failed socio-economic and gregarious policies, and sundry other issues (Balouga, 2009; Odebode, 2004; Ian and Terry, 2003).Odebode (2004) observes that Nigeria’s socio-economic temperature in the spent indecent decades has neither promoted any skin of gregarious and economic good-fortune that can dissociate families from rough negotiate realities nor succor them “benefit from negotiate harvests” (Odebode, 2004, p.12). This is notwithstanding mighty mammon from oil product. Taint has been at the heart of Nigeria’s gregarious and gregarious harvests insurrection, saddling among soldierly and civilian regimes, which enjoy regrettably institutionalised taint in closely all council agencies.
When General Ibrahim Babangida toppled General Muhammadu Buhari’s regime of short than two years in a lurid in-house coup on 27th August 1985, the state saw thirteen years of taint in Nigeria. It is generally agreed that during General Babangida’sregime taint not barely reached threatening excellent plane reprimand but too became instutionalised. For occurrence, directors who were establish turbid by tribunals in the foregoing regimes of Murtala Mohammed and Mohammadu Buharu would following discover their way end into the common life; recovering their seized properties allegedly artificial through infected media. Maduagwu (cited in Gboyega, 1996, p.5) observes that that not barely did Babangida regime entrench taint when he pardoned infected council officials convicted in the foregoing regimes and known them to recover their seized properties, but too “officially sanctioned taint in the state, making it unmanagepowerful to use the barely efficacious measures, hanker prison conditions and seizure of illegally artificial plenty” for contending taint in Nigeria in the coming. The successive regimes succeeding Babangida did unsignificant to plug taint (Balouga, 2009). General Sani Abacha in fitting short than 4 months had ousted the interspace council furthering the taint threat and stagnating the socio-economic augmentation. The Abacha regime saw taint reached its peak delay plsubordinate of learnive media. The Intercollective Centre for Asset Recovery (2009) estimated that the Abacha continuityage quaint took up to US$ 4 billion from the common coffers.
Salawu (2010) observes that the state’s herd is peaceful meagre delay cringing destitution, to the space that it is not barely being categorised unarrangedst the globe’s poorest nations but too graces the globe’s most not-alike countries schedule. Studies enjoy estimated that encircling 70 percent of Nigeria’s population lives under destitution continuity, abundantly due to local disposal of the learnive media such as oil mammon scant avenue to basic amenities and gregarious services such as healthcare (Salawu, 2010).
Chapter 3: Discovery arrangementology and design
The discoveryer proposes to use superfluous discovery arrangement to acception the subordinatestanding of the attitudes, motivation and other non-numerical apprehension. The consider conciliate brave to brave these phenomena using structured and semi-structured scrutinynaires, interviews and contemplation. According to Panneerselvam (2004), superfluous adit to discovery is the most alienate discovery arrangement when considering issues that insist-upon in-depth subordinatestanding of issues. Panneerselvam (2004) advises that discoveryers intending to consider societal issues such as taint and governance should submerge themselves into the cultivation of the companionship and experiment what is in the system. Superfluous discovery concedes the discoveryer to exercitation the scarcityed flexibility, thus the power to reform the emerging sub-questions as they behove over frank delay the crowd, cultivation and system erect (Panneerselvam, 2004, p.158).
Qualitative discovery arrangements succor discoveryers to learn non-numerical responses from respondents using short-structured discovery instruments such as interviews, contemplation and ethnography. Ethnography uses fieldwork to agree a picturesque consider of rational companionship and presents the results as an unconfused undivided that is main than the sum of its talents. It is established on the doctrine that a system’s specific properties cannot regularly be precisely subordinatestood recalcitrant of each other. Superfluous discovery is thus naturalized on relatively little instance sizes and may summon ingrained challenges when vastr instance sizes are scarcityed.
In-depth Instance consider
This discovery conciliate too unite a instance consider as a discovery arrangementology. The instance studies conciliate rendezvous on General Babangida’s regime and Obasanjo’s prevail and haul any similitude and similarities in conditions of socio-economic harvest.
Case consider as a discovery arrangement is favorite due to its power to haul revelation from the experimental phenomenon and practicality (Stake, 1998). Although the discoveryer mayhap zealous in a navigate scrutiny of socio-economic harvest of Nigeria, the instance consider conciliate concede the discoveryer to specifically rendezvous on issues of oil refountain superintendence, taint, and directorship ideals. Instance consider is an significant discovery arrangement accordingly it is powerful to conjoin other discovery strategies, hence the deduce why it is frequently referred to as a meta-arrangement (Stake, 1998). Gillham (2001) argues that a instance consider should not be viewed as over significant than other discovery arrangementologies but should be seen as over suited for exercitation-oriented fields. That is, the power of the discoveryer to act delayin a administrative exercitation is trusting on the apprehension of a repertoire of instances.
3.1 Scope of the consider
This discovery conciliate rendezvous on oil refountain superintendence and its collision on socio-economic harvest in Nigeria. The rendezvous conciliate haul similarities and opposition among General Babangida’s regime (1985-1993) and Olusegun Obasanjo (1999-2007).
Balouga, J. (2009). The Niger Delta: Defusing the Time Bomb. Intercollective Association for Energy Economies 1 (3), 8-11.
Gboyega, A. (1996). Taint and Democratization in Nigeria. Ibadan: Agba Areo Publishers.
Intercollective Centre for Asset Recovery. (2009, September). Sani Abacha. Retrieved on 25 August, 2014 from http://www.assetrecovery.org/
Gillham, B. (2001). Instance Consider Discovery Methods. London, New York: Continuum.
Ian, G. and Terry, L. (2003). Bottom of the Barrel: Africa’s Oil Boom and the Poor. Stanford: Catholic Relief Services.
Julius-Adeoye, R.J. Nigerian Playwrights and Official Corruption: a consider of selected plays. In Oshionebo, B.,Mbachaga, J.D., eds. (2010). Literary Perspectives on Taint in Africa 1. Markudi: Bookmakers, 2 (1), 5-17.
Odebode, S. (2004). Husbands are Crowns: Livelihood Pathways of Low-Income Urban Yoruba Wwomen in Ibadan, Nigeria. The Hague: ISS, 11-12.
Panneerselvam, R. (2004). Discovery Methodology. NY: PHI Learning Pvt.
Salawu, B. (2010). Ethno-Religious Conflicts in Nigeria: Causal Analysis and Proposals for New Superintendence Strategies. European Journal of Gregarious Sciences 13(3), 345-353.
Stake, R. (1998). “Case Studies” in: Norman Denzin & Yvonna Lincoln. (eds.): Strategies of Superfluous Inquiry. Thousand Oaks, London, New Delhi: Sage.