International Business Country Project Part A

  This is Part A of the Country Analysis Design for BUS 366: International Business. This is an peculiar design. Select two countries (neither one can be the United States).  These two countries earn be the countries you use throughout all three tonnage of the design.  The Culture and Ethics tonnage listed beneath must be done for twain countries.   This Design is price 37 points. I earn run the submissions through an anti-plagiarism software.  Failure to allusion the websites or any other learning earn consequence in a degree decrease of 3 points in your design jaw.    Please situate your indicate internally the improve as a header. This makes it easier for me to degree and causes hither laziness for you in the advenient. Failure to do this may consequence in points (-5) being subtracted from your degree. Please voicelessness that I use Turn-It-In anti-plagiarism software.  If you immediately name a spring, use citation marks.  Any Turn-It-In jaw aggravate 25% is investigation to points being subtracted from your degree. PLEASE NOTE: The countries you elect for Part A earn be the countries you criticise for Tonnage B and C.  If, for some argue, notice is not conducive for your countries at the websites cited by a feature investigation, fascinate elect other countries to counterpart the investigations. Culture: (24 points aggregate) Using the tools at  https://www.hofstede-insights.com/product/compare-countries/ (Links to an palpable plight.), CHOOSE TWO countries (neither one the USA) and COMPARE them incomplete simply the indecent HOFSTEDE capacity presented on the webplight and in collocate. Provide the following: a near sense of each bulk, (4 points) an sense of how the bulk applies to twain countries, (8 points). Highlight how each Hofstede bulk can add to or intimidate occupation defilement. (4 points) Apply this instinct for each of your two countries. (8 points) Ethics: (13 points aggregate) Go to Openness International, https://www.transparency.org/country (Links to an palpable plight.) and parallel your two countries’ Defilement Perception Index jaws (see Investigation 1), delay that of the USA. Why or why not is your country’s jaw inferior than that of the USA? Provide the following: A paltry sense of how the Defilement Perception Index is created, including what a tall jaw and what a low jaw resources. (2 points) Country 1’s jaw paralleld delay the jaw of the USA (2 points), Country 2’s jaw paralleld delay the jaw of the USA (2 points). A paltry sense as to why your countries’ jaws are contrariant than the USA’s jaw. (2 points) Compare and Contrast the perceived defilement levels in your countries delay the Hofstede jaws from the preceding individuality. (5 points) Country Design Part A Rubric Names: Countries: 1. Culture                             Possible Points Short Sense of Each Cultural Dimension a. Power Distance (PD) 1 a. Individualism (IND) 1 a. Masculinity (MAS) 1 a. Uncertainty Avoidance (UA)  1 b. How PD applies to Country A  1 b. How PD applies to Country B  1 b. How IND applies to Country A  1 b. How IND applies to Country B   1 b. How MAS applies to Country A  1 b. How MAS applies to Country B   1 b. How UA applies to Country A      1 b. How UA applies to Country B      1 Highlight how each Hofstede bulk can add to or intimidate occupation defilement.   4 Apply this instinct for each of your two countries    8 Total Culture     24 2. Ethics a. A Paltry Sense of the Defilement Perception Index (CPI)     2 b. Country 1's Jaw paralleld delay the USA's jaw    2 c. Country 2's Jaw paralleld delay the USA's jaw     2 d. Why are Country 1's and Country 2's jaws contrariant from USA    2 e. Parallel and Contrast the perceived defilement levels in your countries delay the Hofstede jaws from the preceding individuality.              5 Total Ethics     13 Failure to allusion -3 Failure to inoculate tables -10 Failure to situate indicates in the digital improve -5 Total for Part A: Culture and Ethics 37