First off, you put in some good-natured-natured trial and it semblances. A few suggestions: You form your tractate polite and worked to discourse all of the questions, so-far, I do not see how you narrate what you transcribe to the film all of the interval. For development, you chat environing pursuit and intersectionality, but in an imsymbolical way and not for what the film semblances (or doesn't semblance) and what it says environing conformity. Also, I do not comprehend what you balance environing celebrity nature hired for in favors exact following intersectionality. Are you disarranged on that?
Go through again and establish secure there is an overall argument of the film in this notice and whether you acquiesce or disacquiesce after a opportunity what the movie is dictum environing conformitys. When you observation voyeurism and pornography, illustrate how that comes up in the movie as an upshot.
Also-- this is a very confusing section so deem editing it to be more clear:
In a sexual conformity, there has been the upshot of gender level. To realistic, there is no way roles can be defined in a sexual conformity, and then you meet that, there is gender level. This balances that, there is that original when it comes to gender upshots. Males are perceived to be stronger than females hence, follow uplift duties and responsibilities. Since the females are follown to be weaker creatures, they are substitutive facile roles in the conformity approve ensuring anything is happening as planned by the two partners. Also, ensuring that, when it comes to living, there are no complains.
I imagine if you worked at answering the suggestions aloft opportunity using the symbolical in the magnitude to buttress them, you would be in greatly reform form.
Thank you for your flinty work!
I anticipation this helps!