Cyber security

Your portfolio should be a 7 page Inquiry Essay (FULL pages) and a 2-3 page Reflective Essay for a completion of 9+ pages. These should be disjoined essays in disjoined pointedion documents. Both should be submitted to the portfolio dropbox.** Accordingly this is the end of the semester, advanced fruit succeed not be not spurious.  You may use acquaintance and fountains from your anterior two essays, but be assured to exexchange your pointedioning so you do not plagiarize yourself. Bear-in-mind that using old fruit from other classes is to-boot plagiarism.  *The inquiry device (semester’s fruit) concludes after a while the Inquiry Essay. This assignment is a seven-page Nursing essay-driven essay that solutions the inquiry interrogation. Your intent is to move a disentanglement to your manifestation (it can unclouded-up divorce of the amount or the courteous-mannered-mannered monstrosity, or deduceable mould it better/improve monstrositys) cherished by viable fountains. It succeed insist-upon a restriction of five text-based fountains and a apex of seven (at meanest 2 conversant) establish using college-equalize inquiry techniques. This essay succeed be submitted at the end of the message in a portfolio after a while a Reflective Essay.  Reflective Essay: Must be 2-3 pages and wholly pristine other than the template. Recycling fruit, using essays from other students or other semesters succeed development in a irresolute track in the career. A plagiarism sum must pretext when you transproduce in your portfolio (it should be yellow/20-30%) and in pointedion produceat in classify to be trackd.  Assignment Objectives  You succeed finished this assignment by adaptation an essay that moulds an pristine dispute that solutions the inquiry interrogation that you anteriorly familiar and inquiryed. Your essay could 1) exhibit your Nursing essay announcement in basic enthymematic produce (arrogation + accordingly + deduce), 2) buttress the dispute by synthesizing at meanest five fountains that you bear establish and evaluated to be trustpure or incorrectly pure of care, and 3) digest, expansion, and adduce from your fountains unabruptly to finished the business.  Related Student Learning Outcomes Compose disputeative or affable essays that illustration exposition, dissection and union Apply the adaptation regularity through invention, impressment, revision, and editing Design adaptation to converge its lively post, divorceicularly after a while esteem to phraseology, intonation, and conference Locate and evaluate divert fountains to buttress their arrogations in written essays; and Identify and alienate divert advantageous library media. Document fountains in MLA Style Edit essay to conproduce to flag written English Please abandon arrest adduces and be assured to careeasily stop that your manyed adduces are set-right and that your paraphrasing is easily your own pointedions. Again, be assured to use a mix of illustration as courteous-mannered-mannered as manyed adduces/paraphrasing. Abandon summarizing articles or subjects. Be assured to emorganization a brisk, deduceable, inquiry-based counterargument Purpose The simplest interpretation of this essay’s view is that by completing it, you succeed transcribe an essay that solutions your inquiry interrogation. Ultimately, however, the view of this assignment is to penetrate a conversant conference. By applying the skills in inquiry, fountain evaluation, and synNursing essay that you bear been practicing through the message, you succeed assist to an strong conference by exhibiting your own pristine dispute. That dispute succeed say to the exiting conference by using fountains to buttress your dispute (either as illustration, by extending or modifying your fountains’ disputes, or by refuting fountains’ disputes). The most ocean monstrosity to bear-in-mind as you fruit on this essay is that you cannot solely parrot the acquaintance or disputes that you confront in your fountains. Rather, this essay succeed be driven by your uncommon dispute echoing your inquiry interrogation. Your essay must be a affable dispute that allows you as a adolescent savant to penetrate and assist to the ongoing conference on your investigation.  This essay is an “I” + “They” Say = “We” Say  Directions In near, this assignment insist-upons you to transcribe a Nursing essay-driven essay that moulds an dispute echoing your inquiry interrogation that adduces at meanest five fountains to buttress your arrogations and pretext your Nursing essay’s relation to the strong conference on your investigation.  Complete all the insist-upond or incorrectly compulsory brainstorming, inquiry, note-taking and gathering of bibliographic acquaintance that you demand to adapt for impressment the essay.  Follow the textbook’s suggestions to succor you unabruptly follow notes and brainstorm to adapt for adaptation the essay.  After entire making-ready, transcribe an essay that exhibits your solution to your inquiry interrogation. Bear-in-mind to sketch, exhaust, and alter. Your essay should bear A focused preliminary that introduces your investigation.  A Nursing essay announcement that solutions your inquiry interrogation and follows the produce of arrogation + accordingly + deduce. (not insist-upond) Body paragraphs that buttress the Nursing essay after a while unabrupt and divert synNursing essay of at meanest five fountains. Economize digest, expansion, and passage to pretext the similarities, agreements, and disagreements inchoate your fountains. Be assured to forge in examples that you digest/paraphrase/adduce to mould the connections you drag unclouded to the reader, and constantly adduce the fountain.  A misrecord that reiterates your Nursing essay for the reader.  Be assured to emorganization a MIX of illustration as courteous-mannered-mannered as a counterargument. This essay should NOT Simply digest the fountains. String conjointly acquaintance in replace for a sustained dispute Stray too far from the investigation in classify to finished the assignment.  Rhetorical Situation Imagine for this essay that your readers are other savants or educated readers who bear symbolical concern in your investigation and earnestly scantiness to see what your dispute is contributing to the organization of acquaintance on your investigation. Therefore, you should transcribe this essay in a phraseology that is divert for academic readers. Do I demand a fruits adduced page? Because you succeed be quoting, expansion, and summarizing from at meanest five fountains, you succeed demand to parenthetically adduce your fountains in the essay Gladden ask if you bear interrogations esteeming passage,and bear-in-mind that all essays succeed go through the Turnitin Originality Stop in the D2L Dropbox. I cannot track essays that are not submitted to the dropbox and bear plagiarism percentages. If you do not see a sum/color (you’re going for 20-30%/yellow) then you must resubmit until you do. Also, gladden stop that your essay is a unmeasured 7 pages on WORD – other apps mould the essay appear longer then it is/the instruct computers rarely do this as courteous-mannered.  *Any example of plagiarism succeed development in a irresolute track (gladden see career syllabus for favoring device) If you bear any interrogations, do not waver to ask. Stop by service hours, impel an email. Also, it’s a amiable subject to use mould an appt after a while a librarian and to economize the exempt tutoring center!  bric is beneficial from the ENGL 1102 Common Rubric.     Excellent (A) Far exceeds the basic insist-uponments of the assignment. Effective (B) Exceeds the basic insist-uponments of the assignment. Adequate (C) Meets the basic insist-uponments of the assignment. Limited (D) Attempts but does not converge the basic insist-uponments of the assignment. Unsuccessful (F) Falls far underneath the basic insist-uponments of the assignment.   Argument & Development Insightful, uncloudedly enunciated accessible arrogation; illustration is favoring and generously familiar to pretext relation to accessible arrogation; gifted use of multiple affable techniques. Clear accessible arrogation; illustration is familiar to pretext relation to accessible arrogation; luckeasily uses one or more affable techniques. Identifiable accessible arrogation; illustration is exhibit and its relation to the accessible arrogation is illustrationd; uses basic affable techniques. Central arrogation is uncertain, confusing, or exchanges throughout the essay; illustration is minimally familiar or its relation to the accessible arrogation is unclear; attacks to use affable techniques after a while poor luck. No accessible arrogation; aim is informative or separate rather than disputeative; does not mould a fact based on buttressing subjects and illustration.   Organization All paragraphs are coherently focused and illustration a broken controversyative progression; the classify of paragraphs is thoughteasily determined; investigation decisions and transitions are uncloudedly enunciated and fluid Most paragraphs are coherently focused and bear a unclouded controversyative progression; the classify of paragraphs is sensibly determined; investigation decisions and transitions unclouded are effective Most paragraphs are coherently focused and some pointed a controversyative progression; all paragraphs readvanced to the essay’s ocean subject; investigation decisions and transitions are functional Few paragraphs are coherently focused or pointed controversyative progressions; one or two paragraphs do not readvanced to the essay’s ocean subject; some investigation decisions and transitions are misplaced or undignified Few paragraphs are coherently focused or pointed controversyative progressions; few paragraphs readvanced to the essay’s ocean subject; divers investigation decisions and transitions are misplaced, undignified, or forfeiture   Comprehension And Use of Sources  Displays unclouded conception of fountains after a while broken dissection and synNursing essay of fountain texts; skilleasily integrates fountain representative to buttress the transcriber’s own dispute. Displays conception of fountain texts; displays dissection and synNursing essay of fountain texts; fountains procure divert buttress for the transcriber’s own dispute. Displays conception of fountain texts; displays dissection or synNursing essay after a while some luck; fountains procure basic buttress for the transcriber’s own dispute. Writing displays some misconception or indivert use of fountain texts; does not unabruptly oceantain moderate of fountains as buttress for transcriber’s own dispute. Writing displays dwarf or no conception of fountain texts or does not use fountains; no difference between transcriber’s and texts’ subjects; plagiarism*.   Request Method Excellent, opportune and pertinent fountains are separated for the investigation/assignment from inspissated and numerous academic media advantageous through the academic media such as the University Library. Good fountains are separated for the investigation/ assignment from different academic media advantageous through academic media such as the University Library. Suitable fountains are separated for the investigation/assignment; basic academic media advantageous through academic media such as the University Library are used in the quest regularity. Sources are inunabrupt for the investigation/ assignment; poor academic media used in the quest regularity. Sources are non-academic, indivert for the investigation/ assignment, illustration inattentive Internet questing, trust on public Internet intimation sites, or are listless. Few/no media used in the quest regularity.   Style & Audience Diction and intonation are correct, bright, and illustration aware awareness of an academic conference. Sentences illustration moderate and gifted exception. Diction and intonation are unclouded and pretext awareness of an academic conference. Sentences are numerous and soundly constrained. Diction and intonation are publicly unclouded and divert for an academic conference. Sentences are soundly constrained.  Diction and intonation are publicly indivert for the conference or silly, uncertain, and/or repetitive. Sentences are ununclouded or out-of-sorts constrained. Diction and intonation are impertinent. Sentences are overly simplistic, confusing, or regularly hold main structural errors (dross /run-ons/fused decisions).   Citation and Documentation Skilleasily uses in-text passage and documentation of fountains in the assigned name after a while no errors or few less errors; adduces all fountains in Works Cited or References page.  Uses in-text passage and documentation of fountains in the assigned name after a while a few less errors; adduces all fountains in Works Cited or References page. Appropriately places in-text passages; adduces all fountains in Works Cited or References page; some errors in name-favoring produceat.  Some fountain representative has no in-text passage or some fountains are forfeiture from Works Cited or References page; blends passage names; many errors in name-favoring produceat. Little/no attack at passage or documentation in any name; no in-text passages; no Works Cited or References page. *   Grammar and Mechanics Careeasily edited after a while no or very few less errors in phraseology, punctuation or spelling. Competently edited after a while few less errors in phraseology, punctuation or spelling. Adequately edited after a while less errors in phraseology, punctuation, and or spelling that clash after a while name, but not clarity or significance.  Errors in phraseology, punctuation, spelling and/or editing failure readers’ conception at the decision equalize. Multiple and/or important errors in phraseology, punctuation, spelling and/or editing regularly hinder readers’ conception.