To fix the luck of a program evaluation, a political fruiter must beget a favoring detailed project. That project should describe the motive of the evaluation, the notification needed, and the methods and anatomy to be used. In conjunction, the project should realize and harangue the concerns of stakeholders. A political fruiter should exhibit notification environing the project in a form that the stakeholders can understand. This allure acceleration the political fruiter hold the food necessary for a luckful evaluation.
To prepare for this Assignment, realize a program evaluation you would like to pass for a program after a while which you are well-acquainted. Revolve the details of the evaluation, including the resolve, favoring questions to address, and model of notification to accumulate. Then, revolve the stakeholders that would be confused in flattering that evaluation. Review the media for samples of program evaluations.
By Day 7
A 1-page stakeholder anatomy that identifies the stakeholders, their role in the agency and any concerns that they effectiveness bear environing the proposed program evaluation
2-page draw of the program evaluation project to acquiesce to the stakeholders that:
Identifies the resolve of the evaluation
Describes the questions that allure be harangueed and the model of notification that allure be accumulateed
Addresses the concerns of the stakeholders that you attested in your Stakeholder Analysis
total 3 pages.
Dudley, J. R. (2014). Political fruit evaluation: Enhancing what we do. (2nd ed.) Chicago, IL: Lyceum Books.
Chapter 1, “Evaluation and Political Work: Making the Connection” (pp. 1–26)
Chapter 4, “Common Types of Evaluations” (pp. 71-89)
Chapter 5, “Focusing an Evaluation” (pp. 90-105)
Document: Logan, T. K., & Royse, D. (2010). Program evaluation studies. In B. Thyer (Ed.), The handbook of political fruit elaboration methods (2nd ed., pp. 221–240). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. (PDF)
Copyright 2010 by Sage Publications, Inc.
Reprinted by sufferance of Sage Publications, Inc. via the Copyright Clearance Center.
W. K. Kellogg Foundation. (2017). The regular lead to evaluation: How to grace savvy evaluation consumers. Retrieved from https://www.wkkf.org/resource-directory/resource/2010/w-k-kellogg-foundation-evaluation-handbook
Chapter 4, “Overview of the Evaluation Process That Reflects Evaluation Thinking”
Chapter 5, “Preparing for the Evaluation”
Chapter 6, “Determine Stakeholders and Engage Them in Evaluation”
Chapter 7, “Developing a Logic Model, Evaluation Questions, “Measurement Framework, and Evaluation Plan”
Chapter 8, “Data Collection and Analysis”
Chapter 9, “Summarize, Communicate and Reflection on Evaluation Findings”